Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693378›Full record

ArticleSpine deformity2026

Low bone density at the upper instrumented vertebra, not the residual fractional curve, predicts mechanical failure in adult spinal deformity: a ten-year single-center series.

Kento Yamanouchi, Takeshi Fujii, Aiyush Bansal, Kenneth Nguyen, Renzo Laynes, Mir Amaan Ali, Venu M Nemani, Jean-Christophe Leveque, Philip K Louie

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Spine deformity, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kento YamanouchiCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Takeshi FujiiCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Aiyush BansalCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Kenneth NguyenCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Renzo LaynesCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Mir Amaan AliCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Venu M NemaniCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Jean-Christophe LevequeCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA.
Philip K LouieCenter for Neuroscience and Spine, Department of Neurosurgery, Virginia Mason Franciscan Health, 1100 Ninth Ave., Seattle, WA, 98101, USA. Louie.philip@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4787-1538

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAdult spinal deformity (ASD) is a heterogeneous, three-dimensional condition. In coronal malalignment, the lumbosacral fractional curve has been recognized as an essential driver of both pathology and cosmetic deformity. While various factors have been identified in association with postoperative complications, it remains unclear whether the magnitude of the fractional curve is an independent predictor of the risk of mechanical failure. The two objectives of this study were (1) to determine whether the magnitude of the fractional curve independently predicts mechanical failure, and (2) to determine whether the magnitude of the fractional curve influences lower lumbar lordosis correction.

methodsWe conducted a single-center retrospective study of patients who underwent ASD surgery between 2016 and 2025 (mean follow-up: 21.0 ± 12.5 months). The primary outcomes were radiographic parameters, mechanical complications, and patient-reported outcome measures. Bone mineral density and preoperative comorbidity burden were also assessed as potential predictors of surgical outcomes.

resultsOf the 210 patients who underwent ASD correction surgery, the mean age was 66.9 ± 8.9 years, 140 (66.7%) were female, and mechanical failure was observed in 46 cases (21.9%). A multivariate logistic regression identified preoperative Hounsfield unit at the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) as an independent predictor of decreased odds of mechanical failure (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.98-0.99). A greater fractional curve was significantly associated with greater correction of lower lumbar lordosis (β = 0.20, p = 0.008) while it was not a significant predictor of mechanical failure.

conclusionA greater preoperative fractional curve was associated with increased correction of lower lumbar lordosis and a tendency toward L4-S1 overcorrection, particularly for fractional curves >20°. The magnitude of the fractional curve was not an independent predictor of mechanical failure. Lower preoperative Hounsfield units at the upper instrumented vertebra were independently associated with increased risk of mechanical failure. These findings suggest that the fractional curve should be used to guide the lower lumbar correction strategy rather than mechanical risk stratification, while bone quality at the UIV warrants routine preoperative assessment to reduce the risk of postoperative mechanical failure.

Indexed as

Bone densityFractional curveLumbar fusionSpinal deformity

Identifiers

PMID42693378

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.