Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693374›Full record

ArticleCognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience2026

Evaluating the neural dynamics of affective and cognitive empathy: Insights from a within-subjects experimental design and mass univariate analysis.

Seth B Winward, Roxane J Itier

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seth B WinwardDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada. swinward@uwaterloo.ca.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7712-6950
Roxane J ItierDepartment of Psychology, University of Waterloo, 200 University Avenue West, Waterloo, ON, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6460-5218

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation Grant #213322Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada Discovery Grant #418431Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada PGS #569559-2022
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Event-related potential (ERP) studies claim that affective and cognitive empathy differentially modulate ERPs evoked by painful stimuli such that affective empathy influences early frontocentral components (N1, N2) and cognitive empathy affects later centroparietal components (P3, LPP). However, existing studies only use one empathy task and thus tap into only one construct. We used a within-subjects design in which participants viewed body parts experiencing painful and neutral stimulation followed by faces making congruent painful and neutral expressions. Participants (N = 100) completed four different tasks in response to the stimuli, rating their own discomfort (Affective Sharing), their concern for the target (Empathic Concern), how much pain they thought the target felt (affective Perspective-Taking), and the masculinity/femininity of the target (Control). Data-driven mass univariate analyses were used to analyze all electrodes and epoch timepoints separately for the body part and face stimuli. In contrast to previous findings, affective sharing and cognitive empathy tasks did not differ during early ERP components. For body parts, the effect of pain (painful vs. neutral stimuli) elicited widespread amplitude differences between empathy and control tasks from 200-650 ms, including the N2, P3 and LPP components, with no difference between empathy tasks. For faces, effects of pain started on the N170 and were weaker and more temporally restricted for the perspective-taking task, disappearing after 420 ms while empathic concern and affective sharing tasks elicited activity until 650 ms. We discuss these results and their implications for theories of empathy, emotion, and affective priming.

Indexed as

Affective sharingEmpathic concernEmpathyEvent-related potentialPerspective-taking

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.