ArticleJournal of general internal medicine2026
How Primary Care Intensive Management Teams Coordinate Care for High-Risk Patients: A Multisite Evaluation Using the AHRQ Framework.
Article in Journal of general internal medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPatients at high-risk for hospitalization require care coordination across their multiple conditions. Few studies, however, document performance of specific care coordination activities that together comprise care coordination for these patients. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether and how five geographically diverse primary care intensive management teams delivered care coordination to high-risk patients, and to assess the construct validity of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) care coordination framework for identifying and categorizing the identified care coordination elements. APPROACH: Participants included 29 primary care intensive management team members and 51 patients from five demonstration sites in five different states. Primary qualitative content analysis of semi-structured interviews from the Patient Aligned Care Team (PACT) Intensive Management (PIM) national Veterans Health Administration (VHA) demonstration project evaluation identified activities meeting a broad definition of care coordination. We conducted a secondary qualitative analysis of interviews containing care coordination content to test whether the identified activities could be categorized based on the AHRQ framework.
resultsQualitative data validated the importance of all nine AHRQ domains as critical components of the care PIM delivered, with six of the nine AHRQ domains garnering mention by interviewees at each of the five sites. No activities proved challenging to classify into one of the nine AHRQ care coordination domains.
conclusionPIM teams and their patients identified a wide variety of activities that could be classified as related to care coordination. Further secondary qualitative evaluation showed that the AHRQ framework successfully identified and classified the key activities that intensive management teams and their patients considered to be critical advantages of intensive primary care management of high-risk patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42693369What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.