ReviewJournal of thrombosis and thrombolysis2026
Efficacy and safety of tranexamic acid in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.
Review in Journal of thrombosis and thrombolysis, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hip hemiarthroplasty for femoral neck fractures is often associated with substantial perioperative blood loss and transfusion requirements. Tranexamic acid (TXA) may reduce bleeding, but concerns remain regarding thromboembolic safety. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of TXA in hip hemiarthroplasty. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane were searched from inception to February 2026. Randomized controlled trials and cohort studies comparing TXA with no TXA or no TXA in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty were included. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to pool risk ratios (RRs) and mean differences (MDs), with subgroup and sensitivity analyses conducted to assess the robustness of the findings. The primary outcome was total blood loss. Secondary outcomes included postoperative haemoglobin, transfusion requirement, mortality, thromboembolic events, surgical site infection, stroke MI and length of hospital stay. Although total blood loss was the pre-specified primary outcome, transfusion requirement was also evaluated as an important secondary outcome because of its direct clinical relevance. Fourteen studies comprising 7,660 patients (3,271 TXA and 4,389 controls) were included. TXA significantly reduced allogeneic transfusion requirements (RR 0.48, 95% CI 0.38-0.61; P<0.001) and improved postoperative day-1 haemoglobin (MD 0.48 g/dL, 95% CI 0.14-0.83; P=0.011). A reduction in 30-day mortality (RR 0.69, 95% CI 0.49-0.96; P=0.029) and length of hospital stay (MD -1.57 days, 95% CI -3.12 to -0.03; P=0.047) was observed, although both findings were sensitive to individual studies and should be interpreted cautiously. Total blood loss was not significantly different between groups (MD -162.73 mL, 95% CI -346.49 to 21.02; P=0.076) because of extreme heterogeneity. TXA was not associated with an increased risk of DVT, PE, MI, stroke, or surgical site infection. No significant differences were observed between intravenous and intra-articular administration. TXA is an effective and safe adjunct in patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty. It significantly reduces transfusion requirements and preserves early postoperative haemoglobin without increasing major postoperative complications. Although reductions in 30-day mortality and length of hospital stay were observed, these findings require cautious interpretation because they were less robust and largely derived from observational evidence. Further high-quality randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these potential benefits.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42693320What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.