ArticleThe AAPS journal2026
Importance of Single Global Regulatory Standards for the Assessment of Generic and Biosimilar Medicines to Advance Patient Access.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Generic and biosimilar medicines are foundational to sustainable healthcare, enabling broader patient access globally through high-quality, cost-effective alternatives. However, their market access is hindered by regulatory fragmentation across major authorities, where regulatory expectations are not always clearly aligned across jurisdictions or transparently justified, introducing additional complexity and potential delays in development and approval. This study integrates structured interviews with representatives from generic and biosimilar companies, alongside comprehensive literature and regulatory database reviews, to assess the impact of these regulatory inconsistencies. Analysis of 52 pharmaceutical products across four categories identified several key challenges including duplicated clinical studies across jurisdictions, inconsistent reference product (RP) requirements, and divergent manufacturing standards, potentially contributing to increased development costs and delayed market entry. These challenges disproportionately affect complex generics and orphan drugs, affecting global patient access to critical medicines. Despite promising international harmonization initiatives, substantial obstacles remain. The findings highlight key areas for greater regulatory alignment, including acceptance of foreign RPs, harmonization of technical standards, streamlined development pathways, and enhanced collaboration among regulatory agencies. Such measures are critical to facilitate global development of generic and biosimilar medicines, ensuring timely patient access without compromising safety or efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42693311What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.