Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693283›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Rheumatology2026

Vaccination considerations in autoimmune rheumatic diseases.

Meliha C Kapetanovic

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Rheumatology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Meliha C KapetanovicSection of Rheumatology, Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden. meliha.c_kapetanovic@med.lu.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7853-514X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs) are at increased risk of numerous vaccine-preventable infections owing to a combination of disease-related immune dysregulation, immunosuppressive therapies - including glucocorticoids - and comorbidities. Age-related immunosenescence further increases this susceptibility in older patients. The SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic and measles outbreaks have underscored the importance of optimizing vaccination strategies and improving adherence to recommendations. Nevertheless, coverage for routinely recommended vaccines, including influenza and pneumococcal vaccines, remains suboptimal in this population. Vaccine hesitancy is an important barrier driven by concerns regarding safety, tolerability, disease flares and the potential induction of new autoimmune phenomena. Advanced therapies - including B cell-depleting agents, chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy and bispecific T cell engagers - can substantially impair vaccine-induced immune responses, highlighting the importance of optimizing vaccination timing in relation to treatment. Although most studies focus on humoral and cellular immune responses, evidence on the long-term durability of vaccine-induced immunity, the need for booster doses and real-world vaccine effectiveness in patients with ARDs remains limited. Ethical considerations are important. Although vaccination in adults is generally not mandatory, improving vaccine uptake reduces the burden of infections in patients with ARDs, contributes to herd immunity and provides indirect protection for other vulnerable populations.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.