ArticleHypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension2026
Effects of intensive blood pressure control on cardio-kidney outcomes by KDIGO risk categories: a Post Hoc analysis of ACCORD-BP and SPRINT trials.
Article in Hypertension research : official journal of the Japanese Society of Hypertension, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It reports registered trial NCT00000620. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD)
Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The effects of intensive systolic blood pressure (SBP) control on cardiovascular (CV) and kidney outcomes across different Kidney Disease Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) risk categories remain unclear. We performed a secondary analysis of the Systolic Blood Pressure Intervention Trial (SPRINT) and the SPRINT-eligible Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes Blood Pressure (ACCORD-BP) trial. Participants were categorized into low, moderate, and high/very-high KDIGO risk groups. The primary outcomes were composite adverse CV events (defined as nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, fatal or hospitalized heart failure (HF), and CV mortality) and composite adverse kidney events (defined as a sustained decline in eGFR of ≥ 40% and end-stage kidney disease (ESKD)). We found that intensive BP control reduced the risk of composite CV events (HR 0.68; 95% CI 0.59-0.78), with attenuated benefits in higher KDIGO risk categories (P for interaction = 0.055). This interaction was mainly driven by nonfatal MI and fatal or hospitalized HF (both P for interaction < 0.05). Intensive BP control increased the risk of composite kidney events (HR 1.88; 95% CI 1.52-2.33), mainly in low- and moderate-risk groups rather than in high/very-high risk groups (P for interaction = 0.04). Similar patterns were observed for sustained eGFR decline (P for interaction = 0.03), but not for ESKD (HR 1.05; 95% CI 0.74-1.48; P for interaction = 0.71). The KDIGO risk classification modified the effects of intensive BP control. Balancing CV benefits against potential kidney impacts in patients with different KDIGO risks during intensive BP treatment is recommended. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT01206062 (SPRINT) and NCT00000620 (ACCORD).
Indexed as
Identifiers
42693262What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.