Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693225›Full record

ArticlePediatric research2026

Prediction of retinopathy of prematurity using machine learning models.

Tapas R Padhi, Naresh Nelaturi, Manoj Teltumbade, Jagannadha Ganti, Venkat N Peri, Satya P Rani, Govind Vishnoi, Sheena Gill, Saroj K Sutar, Souvik Bhunia and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Tapas R Padhi *L.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, India.
Naresh Nelaturi *CognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Manoj TeltumbadeCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Jagannadha GantiCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Venkat N PeriCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Satya P RaniCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Govind VishnoiCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Sheena GillCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA.
Saroj K SutarL.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, India.
Souvik BhuniaL.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, India.
Ratnabali MisraL.V. Prasad Eye Institute, Mithu Tulsi Chanrai Campus, Bhubaneswar, India.
Errol R NorwitzCognitiveCare Inc., Milpitas, CA, USA. errolnorwitz@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4643-1546

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEarly identification of neonates at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is essential to prevent vision loss. The goal of this study was to develop, test, and validate machine learning (ML) models to predict which newborns will develop ROP and require treatment.

methodsA real-world, de-identified, clinical dataset including 23,404 medical records from 9205 individuals was abstracted, curated, and processed from 25 newborn care units in Odisha, India. A sequential two-step strategy was used: STEP 1 used demographic, perinatal, laboratory, and NICU variables to predict the development of any form of ROP; STEP 2 incorporated structured findings from specialist ophthalmic examinations, including stage, zone, plus/pre-plus status, and related severity descriptors, to identify which ophthalmically assessed infants would require treatment for ROP. The models used structured clinical variables rather than raw retinal images. Eight ML models were trained and tested for each step. Model performance was evaluated prospectively in a separate cohort from the same population.

resultsThe highest-performing models were Random Forest for STEP 1 and LightGBM for STEP 2. In the prospective validation cohort from the same population, the sequential framework had 84.9% sensitivity (437/515) for treatment-requiring ROP; 78 treatment-requiring infants were not identified.

conclusionThe sequential framework shows promise as a structured-data, workflow-aligned approach for risk stratification in a resource-constrained public-health setting. Its current performance supports further development as adjunctive prioritization support within existing guideline-based screening pathways; model outputs should not be used to defer specialist ophthalmic assessment without additional threshold optimization, calibration, external validation, and implementation testing. IMPACT: Early identification of neonates at risk of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is essential to prevent vision loss. We developed a two-step machine learning framework using a real-world clinical dataset of 23,404 records from 9205 infants. In a prospective validation cohort, the sequential framework had 84.9% sensitivity (437/515) for treatment-requiring ROP. These findings define the framework's role as adjunctive risk-stratification and prioritization support within existing guideline-based screening pathways; model output should not be used to defer indicated ophthalmic examinations. With further model optimization, such a staged approach may help resource-constrained networks prioritize referrals while preserving the safety net of routine screening.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.