ReviewBritish journal of cancer2026
Radiomics as a spatial context for treatment decision-making in head and neck cancer.
Review in British journal of cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Radiomics has been widely explored as a non-invasive biomarker in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC), yet its clinical role remains unclear. Tissue-based biomarkers differ in their susceptibility to spatial sampling. Biomarkers such as PD-L1 expression, immune-cell infiltration, necrosis, and immune exclusion may exhibit substantial spatial heterogeneity, whereas HPV/p16 status and some genomic alterations are generally more stable across the tumor. Nevertheless, localized sampling may incompletely capture heterogeneity in selected clinical contexts. This mismatch becomes clinically relevant when treatment decisions, particularly for chemoradiotherapy, immunotherapy, or de-escalation, are based on potentially non-representative biopsy findings. In this narrative review, we argue that the role of radiomics is not to outperform established biomarkers, but to contextualize them by capturing spatial heterogeneity related to hypoxia, necrosis, stromal architecture, and immune exclusion. We synthesize current evidence linking radiomic features to these biological processes and map them to specific clinical decision points, including larynx preservation, immunotherapy stratification, and recurrence assessment. Rather than serving as a standalone predictor, radiomics may provide complementary spatial information that helps identify situations in which biopsy-derived biomarkers should be interpreted with caution. Although current evidence is largely retrospective, radiomics offers a pragmatic framework for integrating spatial information into biomarker-guided clinical workflows.
Identifiers
42693214What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.