ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Beyond cold to hot: oncolytic virotherapy as the next cornerstone of immuno-oncology.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oncolytic virotherapy has evolved from a platform predicated on lysis of cancer cells into a sophisticated system for intratumoural immune reprogramming; the prevailing 'cold-to-hot' paradigm captures only part of this potential. A fundamental limitation shared by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and early-generation oncolytic viruses (OVs) is a reliance on pre-existing tumour-specific T cells (TSTs), which presents an immunological ceiling that constrains antitumour activity - given that these agents have a limited capacity to generate TSTs de novo. Next-generation OVs overcome this constraint by functioning as agents for antigen-agnostic in situ cancer vaccination: intratumoural infection triggers immunogenic cell death, releasing potentially the full cancer proteome under pathogen-associated and/or damage-associated molecular pattern adjuvant conditions, thereby driving T cell priming against patient-specific neoantigens. In this Perspective, we delineate four pillars for the development of next-generation OVs. First, intratumoural vaccination as immunological ignition, with initial clinical data demonstrating T cell clonotype broadening, abscopal tumour regression and survival benefit in patients with ICI-refractory disease. Second, optimized payload-driven immune priming to hyperactivate antigen-presenting cells. Third, revised efficacy evaluation and end points using response criteria as well as novel biological correlates that better capture delayed and abscopal immune-mediated tumour control. Fourth, OV as the foundational immuno-oncology platform: according to the 'triple-A' framework encompassing admission, availability and activation of TSTs, next-generation, payload-engineered OVs uniquely satisfy all prerequisites for antitumour immunity simultaneously, with evidence from clinical trials of such agents supporting an 'OV-prime, ICI-amplify' strategy. Notably, OVs are systemic immune-reprogramming platforms that are delivered locally, not local therapies with incidental systemic effects.
Identifiers
42693190What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.