Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42693185›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Neurology2026

Role of complement and complement-targeted therapeutics in neurological diseases.

Marinos C Dalakas, Jan D Lünemann

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Neurology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Marinos C DalakasDepartment of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA. marinos.dalakas@jefferson.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7070-1134
Jan D LünemannDivision of Neurology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Complement comprises a group of plasma and membrane proteins that provide an effective bridging function for innate and adaptive humoral immunity. Understanding complement pathophysiology is fundamental given that inappropriate complement function in host defence can lead to infectious diseases and inefficient disposal of altered, damaged or senescent cells can lead to or enhance autoimmune neurological processes. Although the rising number of approved drugs targeting complement pathways remains primarily focused on diseases with complement-fixing pathogenic antibodies (such as myasthenia gravis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder), a robust pipeline of emerging treatments holds promise for expanding complement-targeted therapies to a broader spectrum of autoimmune neurological diseases, such as multiple sclerosis and even neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer disease or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. This Review presents insights into complement biology as it relates to the development or initiation of autoimmune and possibly degenerative diseases affecting the central and peripheral nervous systems or muscle. The effects, merits, risks and challenges of marketed drugs or biologic agents in ongoing phase I-III clinical trials engineered to inhibit proximal or distal components of the complement cascade are also discussed. Anti-complement therapeutics are destined to change the treatment of autoimmune neurologic conditions in which the therapeutic landscape is now becoming crowded with biologic agents targeting other key autoimmunity factors.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.