A unified benchmark of supervised and retrieval-based methods for viral genomic sequence classification.

The rapid growth of genomic sequencing demands fast, accurate, and scalable analysis methods. In viral genomic classification, expanding labeled reference collections can make supervised models costly to update and dependent on fixed label sets, motivating retrieval-based genomic classification as a simpler, more flexible alternative. We present a unified benchmark of supervised and retrieval-based methods for viral genomic sequence classification across three viral classification tasks: hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotyping, COVID-19 discrimination, and human papillomavirus (HPV) genotyping. We compare standard sequence encodings (one-hot, k-mers, FCGR) with dense embeddings (dna2vec, DNABERT). For each representation, we evaluate supervised classifiers (Random Forest, Decision Tree, XGBoost) and retrieval-based classification, where sequence vectors are indexed with FAISS and labels are assigned via similarity-weighted k-NN. Furthermore, we benchmark multiple FAISS index types (Flat, IVF, HNSW, IVFPQ, OPQ) to characterize accuracy-speed-memory trade-offs at scale. The results show that XGBoost and retrieval using Flat or IVF indexes achieve strong classification performance under different computational profiles. Compressed indexes such as IVFPQ and OPQ substantially reduce memory usage, although their accuracy loss depends on the dataset and representation. Overall, supervised XGBoost provides a favorable accuracy-size trade-off, while retrieval-based classification remains competitive and allows labeled reference sequences to be incorporated without retraining a global classifier. This benchmark provides practical guidance for selecting sequence representations, classifiers, and vector-search indexes under different accuracy, memory, and update requirements.