ArticleNature communications2026
Archaic ancestry inference in imputed ancient human genomes.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Archaic ancestry inference in imputed ancient human genomes.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Recent advances in methods to characterize archaic introgression in modern humans.Genome research · 2026Review
- MetaGLIMPSE: Meta Imputation of Low Coverage Sequencing Data for Modern and Ancient Genomes.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
When modern humans expanded from Africa into Eurasia, they interbred with archaic hominins such as Neanderthals and Denisovans. This introgression shaped human evolution, yet most insights have been gained from present-day genomes, leaving little known about how archaic variants evolved after interbreeding. Ancient genomes offer a direct view of this process, but low coverage and poor quality have limited their use. Recent advances in genotype imputation offer a way to overcome these challenges by reconstructing missing information from reference panels and recovering evolutionary signals from low-coverage data. Here, we show that imputation enables accurate detection and quantification of archaic introgression in ancient genomes, improves local archaic ancestry inference, and that regions of archaic ancestry are imputed with especially high accuracy. We further demonstrate that imputed genomes can reconstruct the trajectories of introgressed haplotypes, distinguish populations across time and geography, and identify both known and additional candidates for adaptive introgression.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.