ReviewBMJ paediatrics open2026
RIGHTS principles for early intervention: right care at the right time for every infant, child and family in low and middle-income countries.
Review in BMJ paediatrics open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEarly intervention programmes for infants and young children at developmental risk are implemented inconsistently and inequitably worldwide. Variation in access, surveillance, referral, follow-up and service quality means that children and families may receive very different opportunities depending on where they live, system capacity and resources, laws, policy and local pathways. Practical, evidence-informed guidance is needed to translate 'what should be done' into 'how to implement it' across diverse settings.
methodsThis conceptual, practice-oriented article used a narrative review and an evidence-informed iterative framework-development process. Sources included global frameworks, clinical guidelines and evidence syntheses, randomised and longitudinal studies relevant to low and middle-income contexts and implementation science frameworks.
resultsWe propose six Reach, Identify early, align Goals, Help families deliver, Track and improve and ensure Sustainability (RIGHTS) principles for early intervention programmes: (1) Reach underserved infants, children and families through proactive, equity-oriented and outreach-capable models; (2) Identify developmental risk early through standardised, feasible pathways with clear timepoints, tools, thresholds and referral circuits; (3) align Goals with family priorities, functioning and everyday routines through shared decision-making; (4) Help families deliver intervention using coaching, routines-based strategies and realistic doses of practice; (5) Track and improve systems through standards, service indicators, family experience measures and continuous learning cycles; and (6) ensure Sustainability by institutionalising governance, financing, workforce capacity and policy alignment for durable impact.
conclusionsEarly intervention programmes should be designed to connect timely identification with family-centred, functionally meaningful and feasible support. Embedding standardisation, equity, caregiver partnership and data-informed improvement into service design may reduce unwarranted variation and strengthen continuity of care. Priority research areas include implementation-effectiveness studies, equity impacts, minimum data sets and the cost-effectiveness of scalable and sustainable early intervention programmes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.