ArticleBMJ open2026
Impact of women's coping with premenstrual symptoms on dyadic adjustment and perceived social support: a cross-sectional study in Turkey.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo investigate the impact of women's coping with premenstrual symptoms on dyadic adjustment and perceived social support.
designThe study was conducted with a descriptive and cross-sectional design between October 2023 and February 2024.
settingThe following instruments were administered online: the personal information form, the premenstrual symptom screening tool, the Dyadic Adjustment Scale (DAS), the Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS) and the premenstrual coping measure.
participantsThe study was conducted with 395 women in Turkey.
resultsOverall, 58.5% of the women experienced mild premenstrual syndrome, including 9.6% with moderate/severe premenstrual syndrome (PMS) and 31.9% with probable premenstrual dysphoric disorder (PMDD). Among all participants, the mean scores for DAS and MSPSS were 113.05±20.52 and 63.51±15.13, respectively. Dyadic adjustment was significantly lower in women with probable PMDD compared with other groups (F=5.171, p=0.006). Dyadic satisfaction showed a positive correlation with 'avoiding harm' and 'self-care' subscales, but a negative correlation with 'adjusting energy'. Furthermore, perceived social support increased as scores for 'avoiding harm' (r=0.15, p=0.002), 'self-care' (r=0.18, p<0.001) and 'communicating' (r=0.30, p<0.001) subdimensions increased.
conclusionsHealth professionals should consider routine screening for premenstrual syndrome and involving spouses or romantic partners in educational interventions to improve awareness of premenstrual symptoms and coping strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.