ArticleBMJ open2026
Exploring women's experiences of informational support provided by gynaecologists in endometriosis care: a qualitative study.
Article in BMJ open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundEndometriosis affects approximately one in seven women in Australia and is associated with substantial physical, psychological and social impacts. Informational support is critical for enabling informed decision-making and fostering women's agency in care. While healthcare providers play a central role in delivering such information, existing research has predominantly focused on General Practitioners, despite the pivotal role of gynaecologists in endometriosis management.
objectivesThis study aimed to explore Australian women's experiences of endometriosis informational support from gynaecologists. DESIGN/
settingA descriptive qualitative study was conducted using semi-structured online interviews.
participants16 women over 18 years old living in Australia with suspected or confirmed endometriosis.
resultsThree main themes were generated: Finding a gynaecologist who felt right: navigating a complex care pathway; Variance in informational support before diagnostic surgery and the uncertainty of recovery time; and Understanding what comes next: informational support and its gaps after diagnosis. The women emphasised the importance of finding not just any gynaecologist, but one with specific expertise in endometriosis. Factors such as geographical location, health insurance and referral pathways shaped this process. Once laparoscopic surgery was scheduled, informational support became particularly important in preparing women for the procedure, with surgical techniques and recovery expectations identified as key areas of informational need. Following diagnosis, the women highlighted the importance of clear communication regarding the nature of endometriosis, available treatment options and fertility considerations.
conclusionInformational support was found to be essential across all stages of the diagnostic and post-diagnostic journey. However, the women identified ongoing gaps, suggesting that the provision of information by gynaecologists could be further strengthened to better meet women's needs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.