Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691586›Full record

ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2026

Ultrasonic cavitation in food processing.

Miaomiao Liu, Xiwei Xu, Wei Li

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Miaomiao LiuResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Xiwei XuResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China.
Wei LiResearch Center of Fluid Machinery Engineering and Technology, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, China. Electronic address: lwjiangda@ujs.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ultrasonic cavitation, as a representative non-thermal process intensification technology, has attracted increasing attention in the field of food processing in recent years. However, most existing studies have primarily focused on evaluating the improvement of processing performance in specific food systems, while the intrinsic relationship between cavitation behavior and structural responses of food matrices remains insufficiently understood. This knowledge gap has hindered the further transition of ultrasonic technologies from laboratory-scale investigations to industrial applications. Following the logical framework of "ultrasound-induced cavitation-cavitation-driven processing effects-food matrix responses-engineering applications", this review systematically summarizes recent advances in the application of ultrasonic cavitation for the extraction of natural bioactive compounds, food safety control, interfacial structure regulation, macromolecular modification, and complex food processing. Particular emphasis is placed on the distinct roles of mechanical and sonochemical effects in different food matrices. It is highlighted that the performance of ultrasonic processing cannot be determined solely by individual operating parameters, but rather depends on the synergistic interaction between cavitation characteristics and the inherent properties of food systems.

Indexed as

Food HandlingUltrasonicsUltrasonic WavesCavitation windowFood processingNon-thermal processingProcess intensificationUltrasonic cavitation

Identifiers

PMID42691586
PMCPMC13571751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.