ReviewUltrasonics sonochemistry2026
Ultrasonic cavitation in food processing.
Review in Ultrasonics sonochemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultrasonic cavitation, as a representative non-thermal process intensification technology, has attracted increasing attention in the field of food processing in recent years. However, most existing studies have primarily focused on evaluating the improvement of processing performance in specific food systems, while the intrinsic relationship between cavitation behavior and structural responses of food matrices remains insufficiently understood. This knowledge gap has hindered the further transition of ultrasonic technologies from laboratory-scale investigations to industrial applications. Following the logical framework of "ultrasound-induced cavitation-cavitation-driven processing effects-food matrix responses-engineering applications", this review systematically summarizes recent advances in the application of ultrasonic cavitation for the extraction of natural bioactive compounds, food safety control, interfacial structure regulation, macromolecular modification, and complex food processing. Particular emphasis is placed on the distinct roles of mechanical and sonochemical effects in different food matrices. It is highlighted that the performance of ultrasonic processing cannot be determined solely by individual operating parameters, but rather depends on the synergistic interaction between cavitation characteristics and the inherent properties of food systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.