Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691505›Full record

ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026

Comprehensive evaluation of AlphaFold/OpenFold prediction of experimentally unresolved proteins through novel metrics.

Florencia R Díaz, Daniela Orschanski, Juan I Folco, Juana Espain Ceci, Guadalupe Nibeyro, Horderlin Robles Vega, Juan P Nicola, Elmer A Fernández

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Florencia R DíazFacultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales (FCEFyN), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611, Ciudad Universitaria, X5016GCA, Córdoba, Argentina.
Daniela OrschanskiScireLab, Fundación para el Progreso de la Medicina, 9 de Julio 941, Centro, X5000EMS, Córdoba, Argentina.
Juan I FolcoFacultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Católica de Córdoba, Av. Armada Argentina 3555, Campus Universitario, X5016DHK, Córdoba, Argentina.
Juana Espain CeciFacultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales (FCEFyN), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611, Ciudad Universitaria, X5016GCA, Córdoba, Argentina.
Guadalupe NibeyroScireLab, Fundación para el Progreso de la Medicina, 9 de Julio 941, Centro, X5000EMS, Córdoba, Argentina.
Horderlin Robles VegaGrupo GNOCIX, Facultad de Ciencias e Ingenierías, Universidad del Sinú Elías Bechara Zainum, Cra. 1W No. 38-153, Barrio Juan XXIII, 230001, Montería, Córdoba, Colombia.
Juan P NicolaDepartamento de Bioquímica Clínica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, ica, Facultad de Ciencias Químicas, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Haya de la Torre y Medina Allende s/n, Ciudad Universitaria, X5000HUA, Córdoba, Argentina.
Elmer A FernándezFacultad de Ciencias Exactas Físicas y Naturales (FCEFyN), Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Av. Vélez Sarsfield 1611, Ciudad Universitaria, X5016GCA, Córdoba, Argentina.ORCID 0000-0002-4711-8634

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Predicting accurate protein structures is essential for understanding molecular mechanisms, interpreting the impact of sequence variation, and supporting translational applications ranging from drug discovery to clinical genomics. Recent advances in deep-learning-based predictors such as AlphaFold2, OpenFold, and AlphaFold3 have transformed structural biology, enabling routine in silico modeling even for challenging or previously uncharacterized proteins. However, systematic benchmarking of these tools-especially for novel targets and single amino acid variants-remains limited. Conventional global metrics often fail to capture biologically meaningful discrepancies. By evaluating multiple implementations of AlphaFold2 and OpenFold, together with ColabFold and the AlphaFold3 server, across 10 different proteins and 222 single amino acid protein variants encompassing a wide range of sizes, structures, and functions, we show that although widely used global indicators-like mean pLDDT, pTM-score, and RMSD-frequently suggest comparable performance, substantial local-level differences remain elusive. To address this gap, we introduce a comparative framework leveraging Bland-Altman agreement analysis, to evaluate per-residue Cα-confidence differences and Per-Residue profiles (PRPs), complemented by Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection (UMAP). This approach reveals marked localized divergences, particularly within flexible or intrinsically disordered regions, where both predictor choice and single-residue substitutions trigger the largest conformational shifts. We further demonstrate that using reduced homology databases has minimal impact on predicted structural quality, offering computationally efficient alternatives. Collectively, our findings underscore the importance of integrating global and residue-specific evaluations to more accurately assess robustness, agreement, and practical usability across contemporary protein structure prediction methods.

Indexed as

Computational BiologyProtein FoldingProteinsSoftwareAlgorithmsDatabases, ProteinModels, MolecularPrediction AlgorithmsProtein ConformationProteinsAlphaFold3ColabFoldintrinsically disordered regionsOpenFoldprotein structure predictionsingle amino acid variants

Identifiers

PMID42691505
PMCPMC13541284

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.