Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691486›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Patient-Centered Clinical Decision Support for Recommended Screenings in French Primary Care: Protocol for a Multicenter Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.

Pierre-Yves Meunier, Laurent Magaud, Romain Varnier, Emmie Goetz, Melinda Bekaddour, Ludivine Albert, Inès Khati, Ilhem Bensekka, Julie Haesebaert, Denis Maillet and 2 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07270926 (Feasibility Study of a Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support System for Recommended Screenings in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07270926 narecruitingnot on this map

Feasibility Study of a Patient-centered Clinical Decision Support System for Recommended Screenings in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorHospices Civils de LyonRan2026 to 2027Enrolled210ConditionsPrimary CareArmsADER-F quantitative assessment, Individual semi directive interview with the patient, Individual semi directive interview or r Focus Group with the primary care professional
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Pierre-Yves MeunierCollège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4304-4794
Laurent MagaudRESHAPE (RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2973-410X
Romain VarnierRESHAPE (RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0003-3357-6914
Emmie GoetzRESHAPE (RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0004-7015-1856
Melinda BekaddourHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Clinique, F-69000, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0007-0661-2509
Ludivine AlbertHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Clinique, F-69000, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0002-8854-6202
Inès KhatiHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Clinique, F-69000, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0003-0761-9586
Ilhem BensekkaHospices Civils de Lyon, Pôle de Santé Publique, Service Recherche et Epidémiologie Clinique, F-69000, Lyon, France.ORCID 0009-0004-9549-8696
Julie HaesebaertRESHAPE (RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9109-5604
Denis MailletHospices Civils de Lyon, Service d'oncologie médicale, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud, F-69000, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0001-6883-2696
Julien PéronRESHAPE (RESearch on HealthcAre PErformance), Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, INSERM U1290, Lyon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1709-5152
Laurent LetrilliartCollège Universitaire de Médecine Générale, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6802-7002

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrimary care professionals (PCPs) are responsible for identifying eligibility and supporting patient decisions for a wide range of recommended screenings. However, the number of recommendations (42 for adults in France), complex eligibility criteria, limited consultation time, and competing priorities hinder their systematic delivery. Clinical decision support systems (CDSSs) with patient decision aids may help structure prevention-focused consultations and support shared decision-making, but their feasibility and acceptability in routine primary care remain uncertain. As part of the Aide aux Dépistages Recommandés (ADER) research program, we developed Lianeli, a CDSS designed to provide individualized, patient-centered support for all nationally recommended screenings.

objectiveADER-Faisabilité (ADER-F) is a study with the primary objective of assessing the feasibility of implementing Lianeli in routine primary care by estimating the proportion of patients for whom the CDSS is used to completion. Secondary objectives are to (1) quantitatively and qualitatively describe implementation feasibility, (2) describe organizational adjustments and interprofessional work related to the intervention, (3) explore the association between interprofessional use of Lianeli, health literacy, social deprivation, and feasibility, and (4 and 5) estimate the proportion of eligible, overdue or never screened patients who engage in organized or opportunistic cancer screening, respectively.

methodsADER-F is a noncomparative, multicenter feasibility study with a mixed methods design conducted in primary care centers in the Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes region in France. We plan to recruit 210 adult patients from 21 general practitioners (GPs) across 17 sites. During routine consultations, eligible patients will be invited to complete a self-administered digital health questionnaire in Lianeli, which applies guideline-based algorithms to identify recommended screenings. Within 60 days, patients will attend a dedicated screening consultation during which the GP will validate the patient's responses, discuss benefits and harms of each screening using shared decision-making, and update the patient's screening pathway. Quantitative data will include Lianeli metadata, sociodemographic characteristics, health literacy, social deprivation, implementation feasibility measures (Guideline Implementation with Decision Support [GUIDES]-based questionnaires), and usability measures (French version of the System Usability Scale [F-SUS]). Semistructured interviews with patients and PCPs will be analyzed thematically and integrated with quantitative findings in a convergent metasynthesis.

resultsThe ADER-F study was funded in 2023. Following ethics approval in October 2025 and French National Commission on Data Protection authorization in February 2026, recruitment started in March 2026, with a planned 2-month inclusion period and an overall study duration of 6 months. The results are expected to be published in 2027.

conclusionsADER-F will provide evidence on the feasibility and acceptability of a patient-centered CDSS to support recommended screenings in French primary care. The findings will identify determinants of successful implementation, guide possible developments of the Lianeli software and care pathways, and determine whether a subsequent effectiveness study is justified.

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov NCT07270926; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT07270926. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/89922.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalMass ScreeningAdultFeasibility StudiesFranceHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicPatient-Centered CarePrimary Health Careclinical decision support systemsfeasibility studymixed methodspreventionprimary health carescreeningshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID42691486
PMCPMC13586705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.