ArticlePLOS digital health2026
Implementation of an opioid use disorder (OUD) machine-learning phenotype in real-time for the ADAPT clinical trial.
Article in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
We developed and deploy a real‑time, electronic health record‑integrated machine learning phenotype to identify emergency department patients with opioid use disorder for prospective clinical trial screening and buprenorphine initiation. We conducted a multi‑phase study across three emergency departments in a single United States health system from 2014 to 2025. Using visit‑level data available at or before triage, we trained a random‑forest classifier to estimate opioid use disorder risk and embedded scoring in the electronic health record to trigger point‑of‑care alerts for trial eligibility review. A high-specificity computable training label supported retrospective development, and a clinician gold-standard reference was established through structured chart review. Performance was summarized using discrimination, calibration, and threshold-based classification metrics; prospective validation used a stratified random sample of flagged and unflagged encounters. Retrospective discrimination compared to the high-specificity computable training label was high (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98-0.99; area under the precision-recall curve, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.90-0.94), and calibration plots informed operating‑point selection for real‑time use. In prospective gold‑standard validation (n = 217), 89.3% of model-positive encounters and 95.7% of model-negative encounters agreed with physician adjudication at the prespecified threshold. Because the sample was stratified on model prediction, these are within-stratum agreement estimates; weighting them by the source-population flag rate (28,284 of 866,569 eligible encounters, 3.26%) yields design-weighted estimates of population-level prevalence (7.1%), sensitivity (0.40, 95% CI 0.24-0.64), and specificity (0.996). An electronic health record‑embedded, machine learning phenotype can accurately and feasibly identify emergency department patients with opioid use disorder in real time, streamlining clinical trial enrollment and treatment initiation. Ongoing work will report operational metrics (e.g., alert volume and latency), monitor performance drift and equity across subgroups, and evaluate downstream clinical and trial outcomes.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.