ArticleThe oncologist2026
Nilotinib revisited in GIST: salvage use in patients with severe imatinib toxicity.
Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
20 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere imatinib toxicity is a rare, but relevant event in GIST patients. Other approved treatments were not evaluated within a first-line setting and exhibit severe adverse events that limit QoL. Nilotinib was evaluated within this setting in GIST with a safety profile comparable to imatinib and effectiveness within KIT-exon-11-mutant GIST subgroup (ENESTg1). MATERIALS, PATIENTS, AND
methodsThis is a retrospective case series reporting the outcome and side effects of 20 patients treated with nilotinib following severe imatinib toxicity. Nilotinib efficacy was tested in GIST cell lines carrying common primary and resistance mutations in KIT. Inhibitory profile of nilotinib was characterized using in silico modeling.
resultsIn our retrospective analysis of 1263 patients, 7.3% of patients discontinued imatinib due to toxicity. In 20 patients who received nilotinib, reasons were skin (n = 11) and liver (n = 4) toxicity, followed by cardiac (n = 2) and gastrointestinal toxicities (n = 2). No cross-toxicities were observed with nilotinib treatment. Nilotinib was effective after imatinib intolerance. A secondary KIT Exon 9 mutation was found in a progressing lesion. In vitro viability assays showed effectiveness in KIT-Exon-11-mutant cell lines, but not in Exon 9 or imatinib-resistant mutations in doses deemed clinically achievable. In silico modeling revealed steric hindrance by Exon 9 or imatinib resistance mutations.
conclusionNilotinib exhibits no cross toxicity with imatinib and represents an important alternative in imatinib-sensitive, KIT-exon-11-mutant GIST given its excellent toxicity profile. There is no biological rationale for the use of nilotinib in imatinib-resistant GIST with secondary KIT mutations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.