Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691224›Full record

ArticleThe oncologist2026

Nilotinib revisited in GIST: salvage use in patients with severe imatinib toxicity.

Johanna Falkenhorst, Peter Hohenberger, Giorgia Mancino, Andrea Scrima, Franka Menge, Benjamin S Fletcher, Carina Reiff, Valerie Lange, Rainer Hamacher, Stefanie Bertram and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The oncologist, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Johanna FalkenhorstDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4738-7121
Peter HohenbergerDivision of Surgical Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of University of Heidelberg.ORCID 0000-0001-5359-5923
Giorgia MancinoDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.
Andrea ScrimaDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.
Franka MengeSarcoma Unit, Department of Surgery, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, 68167, Germany.
Benjamin S FletcherDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Carina ReiffDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Valerie LangeDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Rainer HamacherDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Stefanie BertramDKTK Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Fiona M RauDKTK Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Yasmin ZaunDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Moritz KathsDKTK Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Jürgen TreckmannDKTK Partner Site Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Heidelberg, 69120, Germany.
Jens JakobDivision of Surgical Oncology, Medical Faculty Mannheim of University of Heidelberg.
Thomas MühlenbergDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Susanne GrunewaldDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Dawid KrzeciesaDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.
Daniel RauhDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, TU Dortmund University, Dortmund, 44227, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1970-7642
Sebastian BauerDepartment of Medical Oncology and Sarcoma Center, West German Cancer Center, University Duisburg-Essen, Medical School, Essen, 45122, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-5949-8120

Funding

European Union EFRE-800400German Cancer AidGerman Federal Ministry of Education and Research 01ZX2201BGerman Research Foundation 1055/3-2German Research Foundation 413570972German Research Foundation 5214/1-2IGNITE Ex-2021-0033Mercator Research Center Ruhr (MERCUR)Ministry of Culture and Science of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia NW21-062CSarkomtour Fundraising EventState of North Rhine-Westphalia (NRW)TACTIC 70115201Targeting Transcriptional Addiction in Cancer (TACTIC)Willkommen-zurück program of the Medical Faculty of University of Duisburg-Essen
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSevere imatinib toxicity is a rare, but relevant event in GIST patients. Other approved treatments were not evaluated within a first-line setting and exhibit severe adverse events that limit QoL. Nilotinib was evaluated within this setting in GIST with a safety profile comparable to imatinib and effectiveness within KIT-exon-11-mutant GIST subgroup (ENESTg1). MATERIALS, PATIENTS, AND

methodsThis is a retrospective case series reporting the outcome and side effects of 20 patients treated with nilotinib following severe imatinib toxicity. Nilotinib efficacy was tested in GIST cell lines carrying common primary and resistance mutations in KIT. Inhibitory profile of nilotinib was characterized using in silico modeling.

resultsIn our retrospective analysis of 1263 patients, 7.3% of patients discontinued imatinib due to toxicity. In 20 patients who received nilotinib, reasons were skin (n = 11) and liver (n = 4) toxicity, followed by cardiac (n = 2) and gastrointestinal toxicities (n = 2). No cross-toxicities were observed with nilotinib treatment. Nilotinib was effective after imatinib intolerance. A secondary KIT Exon 9 mutation was found in a progressing lesion. In vitro viability assays showed effectiveness in KIT-Exon-11-mutant cell lines, but not in Exon 9 or imatinib-resistant mutations in doses deemed clinically achievable. In silico modeling revealed steric hindrance by Exon 9 or imatinib resistance mutations.

conclusionNilotinib exhibits no cross toxicity with imatinib and represents an important alternative in imatinib-sensitive, KIT-exon-11-mutant GIST given its excellent toxicity profile. There is no biological rationale for the use of nilotinib in imatinib-resistant GIST with secondary KIT mutations.

Indexed as

Gastrointestinal Stromal TumorsImatinib MesylatePyrimidinesAdultAgedAntineoplastic AgentsDrug Resistance, NeoplasmFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMutationProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitRetrospective StudiesSalvage TherapyAntineoplastic AgentsImatinib MesylateKIT protein, humannilotinibProtein Kinase InhibitorsProto-Oncogene Proteins c-kitPyrimidinesGISTimatinib toxicitynilotinibresistancesalvage treatment

Identifiers

PMID42691224
PMCPMC13596059

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.