ReviewHealth promotion international2026
A narrative review of qualitative studies exploring the normalization of gambling for youth and younger adults.
Review in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gambling is a highly visible and socially embedded activity among young people, with marketing, social practices, and digital platforms shaping perceptions and behaviours. This article presents a narrative review of qualitative studies (2015-25) exploring how gambling is normalized among youth and younger adults (up to 35 years), and how they perceive and respond to these processes. Four themes were constructed from n = 22 articles using a reflexive approach to thematic analysis. First, gambling was socially constructed as a normative activity through early family exposure and peer group practices, where participation could both encourage and discourage engagement. Second, exposure to gambling advertising, particularly through sport, was a pervasive driver of normalization, framing gambling as entertaining, glamorous, and overwhelmingly positive. Third, digital access via smartphones, apps, and online platforms further embedded gambling into daily life, enabling engagement in previously restricted spaces and facilitating peer-to-peer participation. Finally, youth and younger adults articulated strategies to counter the normalization of gambling, emphasizing structural and regulatory approaches, including stricter controls on advertising, counter-marketing campaigns, education, and youth participation in policy development. Policy action is needed to tackle the influence of a range of determinants of gambling normalization, with a particular focus on how commercial drivers and political responses impact youth and younger adults in specific sociocultural settings and contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.