ArticleBriefings in bioinformatics2026
X chromosome-wide association studies for quantitative trait loci based on the mixture of general pedigrees and additional unrelated individuals.
Article in Briefings in bioinformatics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide association studies have successfully identified many genetic variants associated with complex traits. However, most existing methods target autosomes rather than X chromosome, and several existing X chromosome-wide association studies (XWAS) at quantitative trait loci (QTL) largely focus on unrelated individuals, with limited attention to general pedigrees or mixture of general pedigrees and additional unrelated individuals (called the mixed data for brevity). In this study, we propose nine novel methods for XWAS at QTL in the mixed data (${\mathrm{MQX}}_{\mathrm{cat}}$, ${\mathrm{MQZ}}_{\mathrm{max}}$, ${\mathrm{MT}}_{\mathrm{plinkw}}$, ${\mathrm{MT}}_{\mathrm{chenw}}$, $\mathrm{MwM}3\mathrm{VNA}$, ${\mathrm{MQMVX}}_{\mathrm{cat}}$, ${\mathrm{MQMVZ}}_{\mathrm{max}}$, $\mathrm{MpMV}$, and $\mathrm{McMV}$), also applicable to general pedigrees alone. The first four methods test for mean differences across genotypes; the latter four test for differences in both means and variances; $\mathrm{MwM}3\mathrm{VNA}$ tests for variance differences only. All mean-based and mean-variance-based methods incorporate X chromosome inactivation information, and all nine methods consider genetic relatedness in pedigrees. Simulation studies confirm well-controlled type I error rates, and inclusion of pedigrees significantly improves statistical power. Note that there has been no study focusing on X chromosome for the mixed data or general pedigrees from UK Biobank database, so we apply our proposed methods to this dataset, which identify five total cholesterol (TC)-associated and 13 low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C)-associated single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs). Linkage disequilibrium (LD) analysis reveals that these SNPs fall into three distinct LD blocks. Functional annotation and gene ontology enrichment analysis reveal 16 and 28 enriched pathways for TC-associated and LDL-C-associated genes, respectively. These methods provide robust and powerful tools for XWAS at QTL in both mixed data and general pedigrees.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.