ArticlePloS one2026
Bioeconomic optimization of zinc and iron agronomic biofortification in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) in Mozambique under tropical field conditions.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Agronomic biofortification with zinc (Zn) and iron (Fe) has emerged as a promising approach to enhance crop productivity while improving food and nutritional security. However, fertilizer recommendations based exclusively on maximum biological yield may not maximize farmers' economic returns. This study integrated agronomic and economic analyses to identify the biologically and economically optimal Zn and Fe fertilization strategies for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L.] Walp.) under tropical field conditions in Mozambique. A randomized complete block design with a 3 × 4 × 4 factorial arrangement was used to evaluate three fertilization methods (soil, foliar, and combined soil + foliar) and four application rates of elemental Zn and Fe. Grain yield response was adequately described by a second-order polynomial regression model (R2 = 0.767), with maximum technical efficiency predicted at 18.92 kg ha ⁻ ¹ Zn and 19.17 kg ha ⁻ ¹ Fe. In contrast, maximum economic efficiency was achieved at lower application rates (16.94 kg ha ⁻ ¹ Zn and 10.09 kg ha ⁻ ¹ Fe), reducing Fe input by 47.4% while maintaining more than 97% of the maximum predicted grain yield and increasing net profit. Across the evaluated treatments, the combined soil + foliar application produced greater grain yield and agronomic efficiency than either application method alone. Economic robustness was further evaluated through break-even, sensitivity, and stochastic risk analyses, which indicated positive economic performance across the evaluated treatnebts under the agronomic, environmental, and economic conditions considered in this study. Within the agronomic, environmental, and economic conditions evaluated in this single-site, single-season study, the economic optimum was reached before the biological optimum, demonstrating that integrating agronomic and economic optimization can substantially reduce micronutrient inputs while maintaining high productivity and profitability. These findings provide an evidence-based framework for developing economically efficient Zn and Fe fertilization strategies for cowpea under tropical smallholder farming systems.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.