Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691111›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Balanced DNA interpolation improves learning of genetic distance-informed embeddings in plants.

Lara M Kösters, Kevin Karbstein, Ladislav Hodač, Laura Albreht, Elvira Sahuquillo Balbuena, Daniel Botello, Olivier Hardy, Phebian Odufuwa, Eva Pardo Otero, Aireen Phang and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Lara M KöstersBiodiversity, Ecosystems and Society Group, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-7913-2377
Kevin KarbsteinBiodiversity, Ecosystems and Society Group, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.
Ladislav HodačBiodiversity, Ecosystems and Society Group, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-6885-1317
Laura AlbrehtUnit of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology CP160/12, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Elvira Sahuquillo BalbuenaEvolutionary Biology Research Group (GIBE), Departamento de Bioloxía, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Daniel BotelloDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, United States of America.
Olivier HardyUnit of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology CP160/12, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Phebian OdufuwaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-7901-9166
Eva Pardo OteroEvolutionary Biology Research Group (GIBE), Centre of Information and Communication Technologies (CITIC), Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Aireen PhangSingapore Botanic Gardens, National Parks Board, Singapore, Singapore.ORCID 0000-0002-0615-0240
Manuel PimentelEvolutionary Biology Research Group (GIBE), Departamento de Bioloxía, Facultade de Ciencias, Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
Rosalía PiñeiroEvolutionary Biology Research Group (GIBE), Interdisciplinary Centre of Chemistry and Biology (CICA), Universidade da Coruña, A Coruña, Spain.
James SmithDepartment of Biological Sciences, Boise State University, Boise, Idaho, United States of America.
Peter WilkieTaxonomy and Macroecology Group, Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom.
Patrick MäderData-intensive Systems and Visualization (dAI.SY), Technische Universität Ilmenau, Ilmenau, Germany.
Jana WäldchenBiodiversity, Ecosystems and Society Group, Max Planck Institute for Biogeochemistry, Jena, Germany.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BBSRC] BB/S019669/1German Federal Ministry for the Environment, Climate Action, Nature Conservation and Nuclear Safety (BMUKN)German Federal Ministry of Research, Technology and Space (BMFTR)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In taxonomic research, traditional phylogenetic tree and structure analyses of genetic data are increasingly complemented by machine-learning-based identification and representation learning. Although the amount of DNA data needed to train state-of-the-art machine learning models often exceeds what can realistically be collected and sequenced in biological studies, the number of samples can be extended artificially through data augmentation. Genetic data augmentation usually refers to the introduction of random base variations, translocations, and reverse complementing. These augmentations do not take into account the inherent structures of populations and species, potentially blurring the lines between entities within genetic datasets. Here, we propose DNAInterpolator, an approach based on interpolation of DNA sequences within a given dataset that presents a neighbor-guided alternative to random mutations. We tested interpolation as an augmentation technique using four flowering plant datasets and an artificial neural network trained to predict genetic distances between paired samples. To address unequally distributed distances within our training datasets, we examined the effect of balancing the distance distribution by curating interpolated sequences. We found that balancing helps models capture genetic distances across the full distance range by strengthening performance in underrepresented regions of the distribution. Our new approach leverages the potential of taxonomic DNA datasets for modern machine learning applications.

Indexed as

DNA, PlantPlantsSequence Analysis, DNAComputational BiologyMachine LearningModels, GeneticNeural Networks, ComputerPhylogenyDNA, Plant

Identifiers

PMID42691111
PMCPMC13577514

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.