Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691100›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Agricultural expansion and mining drive forest loss in Ghana despite declining deforestation rates: Evidence from a national-scale assessment.

Patrick Addo-Fordjour, Francis Emmanuel Awortwi, Caleb Ezekiel Obodai, Francis Boakye Aboagye, Christine Naa Lamiley France, Nana Serwaa Boakye Kusi-Appiah, Derrick Oppong

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Patrick Addo-FordjourDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5102-2961
Francis Emmanuel AwortwiDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5104-0577
Caleb Ezekiel ObodaiDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Francis Boakye AboagyeDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Christine Naa Lamiley FranceDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Nana Serwaa Boakye Kusi-AppiahDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Derrick OppongDepartment of Theoretical and Applied Biology, College of Science, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reliable estimates of deforestation are essential for understanding the dynamics of forest change in order to guide conservation and land management policies. However, considerable variation exists among published estimates of forest loss in Ghana, creating uncertainty regarding the magnitude and drivers of deforestation. Furthermore, deforestation rates have largely been estimated for individual forest reserves or selected landscapes rather than for the entire country. To address this gap, the present study provided a nationally explicit assessment of deforestation rates and forest conversion pathways across Ghana between 2015 and 2025 using multi-temporal Sentinel-2 imagery and post-classification change detection techniques. Land use land cover maps were generated for 2015, 2020, and 2025 and used to quantify land cover transitions, estimate deforestation rates, and identify the dominant pathways through which forests were converted to other land uses. Our findings showed that the landscape was largely characterised by stable non-forest (73.82%) and stable forest (22.36%) cover over the study period. Nevertheless, Ghana lost approximately 279,227 ha of forest between 2015 and 2025, corresponding to a cumulative deforestation rate of 4.95% and an average annual deforestation rate of 0.40% yr - 1. Forest loss increased from 130,878 ha during 2015-2020 to 149,984 ha during 2020-2025, indicating an acceleration in deforestation. Spatial analyses showed that stable forests were concentrated mainly within the southwestern high forest zone, whereas forest degradation was more widespread across the transition and savanna landscapes. Examination of forest conversion pathways revealed that agricultural expansion and mining were the predominant drivers of deforestation, accounting for 80.4% and 11% of total forest loss, respectively. Over the decade, mined area exhibited the greatest proportional increase (533.9%). The findings indicated that agricultural expansion remains the principal cause of forest loss in Ghana, although the rapid growth of mining activities constitutes an emerging threat to the country's forest ecosystems. Continued forest loss is likely to undermine carbon sequestration capacity and compromise the contribution of Ghana's forests to climate-change mitigation. By providing updated and spatially explicit estimates of forest change, this study fills a critical knowledge gap in national-scale deforestation assessment in Ghana. It also provides information relevant to national forest monitoring, land-use planning, and the development of strategies aimed at reducing deforestation and promoting sustainable landscape management.

Indexed as

AgricultureConservation of Natural ResourcesForestsMiningEcosystemGhanaTrees

Identifiers

PMID42691100
PMCPMC13541180

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.