Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691095›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Rethinking fitspiration in social media: Experimental insights from young Chinese women.

Siyi Song, Jinfeng Du, Huangkun Wei, Muhamad Shamsul Ibrahim, Hamedi Mohd Adnan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Siyi SongJiangxi University of Software Professional Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1621-8681
Jinfeng DuSchool of Foreign Languages, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9693-4664
Huangkun WeiJiangxi Institute of Technology, Nanchang, Jiangxi, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7426-0874
Muhamad Shamsul IbrahimDepartment of Media and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6200-8268
Hamedi Mohd AdnanDepartment of Media and Communication Studies, Faculty of Arts and Social Sciences, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As social media platforms increasingly influence contemporary understandings of health and the body, fitspiration-a blend of "fitness" and "inspiration"-has become a widespread visual genre that promotes exercise, discipline, and culturally idealized physiques. Recent research has linked fitspiration content to negative body image among women, yet most studies focus on Western populations. Cultural differences in beauty ideals suggest that findings from Western contexts may not fully apply to Asian women. However, research on fitspiration in Asia, particularly China, remains limited. To address this gap, this study conducted an online experiment with 414 Chinese women aged 18-26, randomly assigned to view thinspiration, fitspiration, or neutral scenery images. Body appreciation and functionality appreciation were measured before and after exposure. Results showed that fitspiration images significantly reduced both body and functionality appreciation compared to neutral images. Thinspiration images produced even lower body and functionality appreciation than fitspiration. This study underscores the need to recognize and critically examine the potential risks of fitspiration content within the Chinese cultural context.

Indexed as

Body ImageSocial MediaAdolescentAdultBeautyBody SatisfactionChinaEast Asian PeopleFemaleHumansYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42691095
PMCPMC13541199

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.