Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691071›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Robust circular cluster-based statistics for respiration-brain coupling.

Teresa Berther, Elio Balestrieri, Martina Saltafossi, Laura Bock Paulsen, Lau M Andersen, Daniel S Kluger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Teresa BertherInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Elio BalestrieriInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Martina SaltafossiInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.
Laura Bock PaulsenDepartment of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0002-6277-0460
Lau M AndersenDepartment of Linguistics, Cognitive Science and Semiotics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.ORCID 0000-0001-7323-0614
Daniel S KlugerInstitute for Biomagnetism and Biosignal Analysis, University of Münster, Münster, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-0691-794X

Funding

European UnionInnovative Medical Research (IMF) programme of the University of MünsterInterdisciplinary Centre for Clinical Research Münster
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapidly developing research field of brain-body neuroscience faces methodological challenges, as analysts continue to develop new analysis strategies in the absence of established best practices. This quest for valid methods is further complicated by the (naturally) circular data involved in the study of phase-locked effects, e.g., in respiration-brain coupling. Various available approaches for phase extraction, constructing adequate surrogate data for statistical comparison, and accounting for the circularity of respiratory data lead to poor cross-study generalisability of results. Interpretation of effects is particularly affected by the problem of multiple comparisons in phase-related inferential statistics. In this tutorial, we propose a robust pipeline for respiration phase-related analyses based on a novel circular extension of cluster-based permutation testing. We highlight and offer guidance on critical parameters in the analysis, systematically compare various approaches being used in the field today, and provide open-access software code for flexible use and future development of our proposed pipeline.

Indexed as

BrainRespirationAlgorithmsCluster AnalysisClustering AlgorithmsComputational BiologyHumansSoftware

Identifiers

PMID42691071
PMCPMC13541119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.