ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2026
Predictive association between control measures and chikungunya fever incidence based on random forest and SHAP analysis.
Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundUsing the 2025 Chikungunya fever (CHIK) outbreak in Chancheng District, Foshan City, this study applied a random forest (RF) regression model combined with SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) to explore predictive associations, nonlinear relationships and potential thresholds between environmental-social factors and village/community-level cumulative incidence, to inform stratified control of mosquito-borne diseases. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL
findingsIn this cross-sectional ecological study of 143 villages/communities, the outcome was cumulative incidence, and nine candidate covariates were assessed, including the hospitalization isolation rate, construction-site density, and population density. Multicollinearity was checked using the variance inflation factor. Model fit was evaluated by the out-of-bag (OOB) R², RMSE, and MAE, and variable importance by %IncMSE. Robustness was tested with 100 repeated runs, bootstrap thresholds from SHAP dependence plots, and a sensitivity analysis excluding the endogenous isolation rate. On the log(1 + incidence) scale, the OOB R² was 0.206, with underestimation of high-incidence areas. The hospitalization isolation rate had the highest importance (%IncMSE = 18.43) and was negatively correlated with predictions (ρ = -0.749), but this likely reflects reverse causation and is predictive only. Construction-site density was strongly positive (ρ = 0.855), with a stable threshold near 12.8 sites/km²; it remained the most robust predictor after removing the isolation rate (%IncMSE = 8.54). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Construction-site density was the most robust environmental predictor, whereas population density contributed little. These exploratory, predictive associations-not causal effects-should guide risk stratification and require prospective validation with time-matched longitudinal data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.