Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691053›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

The American dream: Election night dreams predict overnight change in feelings about the election and the future.

William H Livingston, Adam L Putnam, Erin J Wamsley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

William H LivingstonFurman University Department of Psychology, Greenville, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0003-4958-6727
Adam L PutnamFurman University Department of Psychology, Greenville, South Carolina, United States of America.
Erin J WamsleyFurman University Department of Psychology, Greenville, South Carolina, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4465-3890

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Real-life experiences are often incorporated into our dreams. Does dreaming about those experiences affect how we feel about them? Prior studies have suggested that dreaming may attenuate emotional reactivity overnight, with participants feeling less negative about an experience after dreaming about it. The present study used the 2024 US presidential election to examine the relationship between dreaming and emotional reactivity in the context of a real-life emotional experience. We hypothesized that dreaming about the election would be associated with reduced negative feelings toward it the following morning. N = 931 American participants completed an online survey on the day of and the day after the 2024 US election. Participants rated their feelings about the election, their personal future, and the collective future of the country before and after election night and reported their dreams from that night. Contrary to our hypotheses, dreaming about the election was associated with intensified negative affect the next morning, including a more negative outlook on the personal and collective future. This pattern was specific to Democrats and Independents - dreaming about the election was not associated with overnight changes in affect among Republicans. Contrary to emotional regulation theories of dreaming, these observations suggest that sleep and dreaming are associated with amplified emotional reactivity, at least in the short-term.

Indexed as

DreamsEmotionsPoliticsVotingAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42691053
PMCPMC13541154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.