ArticlePloS one2026
Smart fertigation: Automated fertilizer application based on plant growth using digital sensors with IoT capability.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Liquid organic fertilizers (LOF) are used to supply additional nutrients to crops. However, LOF are expensive to use regularly. In this research, a smart fertigation treatment (S), where LOF was applied based on lettuce plant growth, was compared to a manual treatment (M) in a greenhouse. Digital sensors with IoT capability were installed in S and M treatments. The sensor in S treatment was interfaced to a solid-state relay connected to a pump, to automatically regulate LOF application. Digital sensors in both treatments measured canopy area (CA) of plants once every three days using image analysis and remotely exchanged data. In the M treatment, LOF was applied every third day to plants, whereas the LOF application was regulated by the sensor in S treatment to happen only when CA of plants was lower by 10% than those in the M treatment. Results indicated no differences in fresh weight (33.4 vs. 32.3 g·plant-1) and leaf area (770.2 and 772.6 cm-2) of plants between two treatments. Nutrient concentration in the root zone, measured as electrical conductivity of substrate, was significantly higher (21-69%) in M than S treatment. The number of fertigation events and cost of LOF applied were approximately four times higher in M than S treatment. This resulted in higher fertilizer-use-efficiency in S (1.159 kg ∙ m-2 ∙ $-1) than M (0.168 kg ∙ m-2 ∙ $-1) treatment. These results indicate that the smart fertigation method can optimize LOF application (i.e., reduce wastage and costs) while maintaining crop growth.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.