Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42691039›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

'My dog is my life': One Health approaches to healthcare for people and their companion animals experiencing homelessness in the United Kingdom.

Rebekah Sullivan, Andrew Gardiner, Glen Cousquer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Rebekah SullivanRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland.
Andrew GardinerRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland.
Glen CousquerRoyal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, University of Edinburgh, Easter Bush Campus, Roslin, Midlothian, Scotland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-2098-6819

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Around one in ten people seeking shelter from homelessness in the United Kingdom have a companion animal, most commonly a dog. Dog ownership when homeless can pose a barrier to accessing healthcare and accommodation, and may force individuals to sleep on the streets. People experiencing homelessness with a dog are therefore a stigmatised minority within a minority, often invisible to support services and hard to reach. The bond between human and canine in these situations is usually strong; the dog is often the most significant 'other' in that person's life. Failure to accommodate this relationship as part of a holistic approach has implications for both human and animal healthcare in the homeless community. Bringing these two healthcare disciplines together represents a specific application of One Health that can help us better realise their collaborative transdisciplinary potential. Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to explore health needs and challenges for people experiencing homelessness with companion dogs in the UK and to investigate the feasibility of joint healthcare provision. Study participants included people experiencing homelessness and service providers working in veterinary or human healthcare and housing services. Human and animal health were considered entangled by both service users and service providers, requiring an approach which accounts for the needs of human and animal together. The idea of joint delivery of human and animal healthcare at the same venue was of interest to both service users and providers but also raised concerns. While sparse examples are available in the literature, a more workable concept may be to aim for a 'coordinated multi-species healthcare' which is responsive and empathic to the needs of both people and dogs.

Indexed as

Ill-Housed PersonsOne HealthPetsAnimalsDogsFemaleHuman-Animal BondHumansMaleUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID42691039
PMCPMC13541128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.