ArticlePloS one2026
Lighthouse-shaped rapid identification device for acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water: A low-cost detection method based on conductivity differences.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo address the safety risk of mistaking tap water or purified water for acidic electrolyzed oxidizing water (AEOW) during manual cleaning in central sterile supply departments (CSSDs), this study aimed to develop a low-cost, rapid identification device based on electrical conductivity differences to ensure the accuracy and safety of the disinfection process.
methodsA lighthouse-shaped rapid identification device (LRID) was fabricated based on the significantly higher electrical conductivity of AEOW compared with tap water and purified water. Centered on an Arduino Nano microcontroller, the device integrates a conductivity sensor, a wireless charging module, and an LED indication system. It achieves automatic discrimination by detecting liquid electrical conductivity: the green LED remains illuminated for AEOW, while the red LED lights up for tap water or purified water. Identification accuracy, battery life, and waterproof performance were evaluated, and the satisfaction of CSSD technicians with the conventional pH test strip method and the LRID was compared.
resultsThe LRID achieved 100% identification accuracy (90/90) for AEOW, tap water, and purified water collected from the CSSDs of 10 hospitals. The average battery life was 83.75 ± 1.27 h, supporting a weekly charging schedule. All devices functioned normally after continuous immersion in AEOW for 30 days, confirming reliable waterproof performance. Scores from 28 CSSD technicians showed that the LRID was significantly superior to the pH test strip method in identification accuracy, ease of operation, and promotability (P < 0.001).
conclusionThis study successfully developed and validated a low-cost (approximately 20 USD), highly reliable, and easy-to-operate AEOW rapid identification device. The LRID effectively prevents disinfection failures caused by liquid misuse in CSSDs and holds significant potential for its application and promotion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.