ReviewThe Indian journal of medical research2026
Acceptability, benefits, and challenges of teleconsultation: A qualitative study among doctors in Manipur.
Review in The Indian journal of medical research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and objectives Teleconsultation through eSanjeevani can reduce the burden on secondary and tertiary hospitals and meet healthcare delivery challenges in rural and remote areas. This study explored doctors' perspectives to assess the acceptability of teleconsultation and to identify perceived benefits and challenges of teleconsultation services in Manipur. Methods A qualitative study was conducted from January to May 2024 among doctors registered with eSanjeevani in Manipur. In-depth interviews were conducted with purposively selected doctors from different districts, and data were analysed thematically using an abductive approach. Thematic saturation was achieved after 11 interviews. Results Involved doctors perceived teleconsultation as acceptable to patients, doctors, and the health system. Participants reported improved access to general and specialist care in remote areas, with reduced travel, costs, and time for patients. Key benefits included early case identification, timely referral, follow up of chronic diseases, and maintenance of electronic medical records. Community health officers (CHOs) played an important role in enhancing consultation quality and acceptability. Major challenges included poor network connectivity, limited direct physical examination, limited public awareness, unclear guidelines, increased workload due to the absence of designated telemedicine doctors, the absence of regular review mechanisms, and limited availability of medicines and diagnostic facilities at peripheral facilities. Interpretation and conclusions Teleconsultation was acceptable and beneficial in improving access to healthcare, despite persistent operational challenges. Designating dedicated telemedicine doctors with structured rosters, regular specialist scheduling, capacity-building for CHOs, improved dissemination of guidelines, IEC-based awareness generation, and stakeholder motivation are essential for sustaining teleconsultation services.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.