ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2026
Integrating Computational Chemistry and Ion Mobility Spectrometry into Non-Targeted Analysis Workflows for the Structural Elucidation of Emerging PFAS.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are an evolving class of synthetic chemicals that are pervasive in the environment due to widespread manufacturing and consumer use, such that PFAS contamination is of great concern. Although thousands of PFAS structures have been reported to date, this number increases daily with the identification of new PFAS from advances in non-targeted analysis (NTA) workflows. Ion mobility spectrometry in combination with mass spectrometry (IMS-MS) has recently been incorporated into PFAS NTA studies. Although MS provides essential precursor and fragmentation data, IMS offers complementary structural information via the measurement of the ion-neutral collision cross section (CCS) values. Experimental CCS values can then be compared with those calculated in silico from candidate 3D structures to meet confidence-level criteria in analyte assignments within NTA workflows. Although this approach has been applied since the late 1990s, PFAS often exhibited poorer agreement between the calculated and experimental CCS values. To address this limitation, we propose an optimized computational workflow to calculate Boltzmann-weighted CCS values for PFAS structures generated via quantum-chemical calculations. This workflow was assessed with experimental CCS values from 56 known PFAS structures across seven classes and resulted in an average percent error of 2.0%. Moreover, 11 new PFAS structures were proposed from NTA, with average errors of 1.3%. The combination of this new computational workflow and experimental IMS-MS measurements therefore establishes a workflow for structural elucidation of emerging PFAS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.