ArticleThe breast journal2026
Assessing the Effect of Breast Density on Screening Performance in a Population-Based Program.
Article in The breast journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundBreast density is both an independent risk factor for breast cancer and a major determinant of mammographic diagnostic performance. However, its impact on overall screening performance within population-based screening programs is less well understood.
methodsThis retrospective cohort study included women aged 50-74 years screened through BreastScreen NSW between 1 January 2016 and 31 December 2017, excluding first-time screeners above 70. Breast density was assessed using Lunit INSIGHT MMG (v1.1.7) generating an ordinal density score (1-10) and corresponding BI-RADS category (A-D). Screen-detected and interval cancers were ascertained via the NSW BreastScreen Information System and the NSW Cancer Registry. Standard screening performance metrics were calculated stratified by age, breast density and screening round.
resultsThe cohort comprised 564,681 screening episodes, with 4758 cancers diagnosed (3756 screen-detected; 1002 interval). Cancer incidence rates and screening performance varied by breast density. The proportion of cancers that were interval cancers increased markedly with increasing density, from 10.9% of cancers in category A (least dense) to 46.6% in category D. Recall rates followed an N-shaped pattern, peaking in density category C, while specificity mirrored this relationship.
conclusionThe effectiveness of conventional two-dimensional mammography is strongly dependent on breast density, with reduced sensitivity and increased interval cancer rates for clients with extremely dense breasts. By utilising a more granular measure of breast density in a large population screening cohort, this study identified nonlinear relationships between breast density and screening performance metrics, providing evidence to support future evaluation of more individualised screening approaches.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.