ArticleGeneral thoracic and cardiovascular surgery2026
Impact of preoperative nutritional status on longitudinal changes in pulmonary function and prognosis after lung cancer surgery.
Article in General thoracic and cardiovascular surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePreoperative nutritional status is a known prognostic factor in lung cancer surgery. However, its effect on postoperative pulmonary function over time remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between preoperative nutritional status and longitudinal respiratory changes andoutcomes after curative resection.
methodsPatients who underwent resection for non-small cell lung cancer between January 2020 and December 2024 were prospectively analyzed. Patients were classified by prognostic nutritional index (PNI) into normal (PNI ≥ 50) and malnutrition (PNI < 50) groups. Pulmonary function, including forced vital capacity (FVC), forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1.0), and diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (%DLco), was assessed preoperatively and at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Changes were compared between lobectomy and sublobar resection by nutritional status. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were analyzed.
resultsOf 551 surgical patients, 294 were included. Low PNI was associated with significantly worse OS and RFS (P < 0.001 and P = 0.005, respectively). Patients with low PNI undergoing lobectomy showed poorer survival outcomes in unadjusted analyses, although interaction analysis demonstrated no significant modification of the prognostic impact of PNI by surgical procedure. Among patients undergoing lobectomy, postoperative FVC recovery differed according to nutritional status (p=0.016), whereas no significant differences were observed in FEV1.0 or %DLco.
conclusionsLow preoperative PNI was associated with poorer survival and may be associated with postoperative pulmonary functional recovery after lung resection. Preoperative nutritional status may warrant consideration alongside established clinical and oncological factors when planning surgical treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690582What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.