ArticleRadiological physics and technology2026
RadTechBERT: a domain-specific language model for radiological technology evaluated using Japanese national examination-derived cloze questions.
Article in Radiological physics and technology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Specialized language models can improve performance in expert domains; however, in radiological technology, evaluation datasets and models tailored to radiological technologists' practice remain limited and are not widely available. In this study, RadTechBERT was developed by pretraining a Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers on a radiological technology-specific corpus from the initial pretraining stage, without relying on continued pretraining of existing general models. To enable systematic evaluation, a new cloze question dataset was constructed from items derived from the Japanese national examination for radiological technologists, and subject labels were added to support subject-level analyses. To develop the model, Unigram and Byte Pair Encoding (BPE) tokenizers were compared with vocabulary sizes of 32 K, 50 K, and 100 K. RadTechBERT was trained under two settings: using only the domain-specific corpus and using a mixed corpus that additionally included Wikipedia. For benchmarking, baseline models pretrained on general corpora such as Wikipedia, as well as existing and medical textbook-based models, were also evaluated. Performance was assessed using Top-5 accuracy on the cloze task, both overall and by subject. RadTechBERT with BPE_32K outperformed baselines in many subjects, with more than a twofold improvement in radiation safety management and radiation measurement relative to the strongest baseline. In contrast, gains were smaller in subjects having substantial overlap with general medicine, and Wikipedia mixing did not yield consistent improvements. The optimal tokenizer and vocabulary size were subject-dependent.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690576What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.