ReviewCurrent pain and headache reports2026
Fascial Plane Blocks in Perioperative and Pain Medicine: From Mechanisms to Emerging Multitarget Interfascial Strategies.
Review in Current pain and headache reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewFascial plane blocks (FPBs) are increasingly used in perioperative and pain medicine, but their clinical role remains difficult to define because mechanisms, nomenclature, and evidence quality vary across techniques and indications. RECENT
findingsRecent anatomical and clinical literature supports a shift away from viewing fascia as a passive conduit. Deep fascia is innervated, mechanically active, and organized into communicating compartments that may influence injectate spread and analgesia. Established techniques such as erector spinae plane, transversus abdominis plane, quadratus lumborum, pectoral plane, and serratus anterior plane blocks provide useful but indication-specific perioperative benefits. Comparative evidence is more nuanced when FPBs are tested against paravertebral or epidural techniques. Emerging posterior cervical and periscapular multitarget approaches are anatomically plausible but are supported only by a seven-patient uncontrolled series, technical or anatomical descriptions, and small retrospective uncontrolled studies; they should therefore be regarded as hypothesis-generating rather than practice-changing. Large-volume dosing and cumulative systemic local anesthetic exposure remain important safety considerations. FPBs should be used as anatomy-guided, indication-specific interventions rather than as a uniform class of interchangeable blocks. Emerging multitarget strategies are not yet established clinical recommendations. Future work should prioritize standardized nomenclature, dose discipline, comparative trials, and patient-centered outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690557What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.