ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Analysis of EEG microstate transition patterns and multi-instance learning-based recognition model for depression.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Accurate identification of major depressive disorder (MDD) and characterization of abnormal higher-order brain-state transitions remain important in electroencephalography (EEG)-based depression research. Although EEG microstate analysis provides a promising high-temporal-resolution tool for probing abnormal brain dynamics, most existing studies focus on static microstate parameters and may overlook higher-order transition structure embedded in microstate sequences. To address this issue, we proposed a rule-driven microstate sequence analysis framework for EEG-based depression recognition. Specifically, the RuleGrowth algorithm was used to mine discriminative microstate transition rules, which were incorporated into an attention-based multiple instance learning model for classification. The proposed method outperformed conventional approaches based on static microstate features on both datasets, achieving accuracy, F1-score, and area under the curve (AUC) values of 96.67%, 94.12%, and 97.23% on the multi-modal open dataset for mental disorder analysis (MODMA) dataset, and 92.67%, 92.78%, and 94.50% on the self-collected dataset. In addition, both datasets showed significant group differences in higher-order transition patterns after false discovery rate (FDR) correction ([Formula: see text]), with 7 and 13 significant rules identified, respectively, and the C→D→B and A→D→B rules consistently showing higher confidence in the MDD group than in healthy controls across both datasets. These findings indicate that MDD is associated with disrupted higher-order brain-state switching dynamics and support the utility of rule-based microstate representations for EEG-based depression analysis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690530What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.