Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690518›Full record

ArticleJournal of psycholinguistic research2026

Assessing Definitional Competence: Construction, Validation, and Applications of the Co.De. Scale.

Belacchi Carmen, Benelli Beatrice, Domenicucci Riccardo

Abstract readValidation Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of psycholinguistic research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Belacchi CarmenDepartment of Communication Sciences, Humanities and International Studies, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5562-8311
Benelli BeatriceDepartment of Developmental Psychology and Socialisation, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
Domenicucci RiccardoDepartment of General Psychology, University of Padua, Via Venezia, 8, 35131, Padua, Italy. riccardo.domenicucci@unipd.it.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7439-0932

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Definitional competence involves the ability to understand and produce definitions of different kinds of words. The Co.De. Scale was developed to systematically assess this skill across age groups, emphasizing both linguistic form and semantic content. This study aimed to provide normative data for the Italian population and validate the Co.De. Scale in terms of its validity, reliability, and responsiveness. A sample of 2262 participants aged 3-62 years from various regions in Italy was assessed using the Co.De. Scale, and age-stratified percentile norms were derived. Dimensionality and construct validity were examined through parallel analysis, confirmatory factor analyses comparing different models, an item response theory model, and measuremen-invariance analyses across gender and age-group; convergent validity was examined though associations with linguistic and cognitive measures. Reliability was evaluated via internal consistency and inter-rater agreement, and responsiveness via pre-post changes in an intervention study. Definitional competence showed a clear developmental progression, with significant effects of age and education levels. Bifactor indices supported an essentially unidimensional structure, which was fully invariant across gender but-consistent with a developing ability-not across age groups. The scale showed excellent internal consistency, high inter-rater agreement, significant correlations with related constructs, and sensitivity to intervention-related change. The Co.De. Scale is psychometrically sound tool for assessing definitional competence from preschool to adulthood. Its applications in educational, clinical, and research settings, combined with its ability to capture developmental changes, underscore its value for understanding and enhancing linguistic and cognitive development.

Indexed as

PsychometricsAdolescentAdultChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansItalyMaleMiddle AgedReproducibility of ResultsYoung AdultCo.De. ScaleCognitive developmentDefinitional competenceMetalinguistic skillsPsychometric validation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.