Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690516›Full record

ReviewMolecular biology reports2026

Nanotherapeutics in osteosarcoma: Advances in miRNA nanocarriers and targeted drug delivery.

Arnab Dey, Usman Ibrahim Yakubu, Mohini Singh

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular biology reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Arnab DeyDepartment of Life Science, Sharda School of Bio-science and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.
Usman Ibrahim YakubuDepartment of Life Science, Sharda School of Bio-science and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India.
Mohini SinghDepartment of Life Science, Sharda School of Bio-science and Technology, Sharda University, Greater Noida, India. mohini.singh@sharda.ac.in.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Osteosarcoma remains one of the most aggressive primary malignant bone tumor, despite all the treatment options available, there has been little progress in osteosarcoma treatment in children and young adults with metastatic or recurrent osteosarcoma. The link between dysregulated microRNAs (miRNAs) in osteosarcoma pathogenesis, metastasis, chemoresistance and immune system regulation increasingly shows that they are important drug targets for novel therapies. The clinical application of naked miRNAs is dramatically limited by the fact that they are rapidly degraded by nucleases, have a poor uptake by the cells, are poorly specific for tumors and may lead to off-target effects. Solution to these challenges is one of the innovative delivery systems based on nanocarriers that provides increased stability of miRNA, improvement of pharmacokinetics, improvement of cellular entry and a controlled release. The present review critically analyzes the ongoing developments of miRNA therapeutics for osteosarcoma focusing on the various nanocarriers such as polymeric, lipid-based, inorganic, hybrid and exosome-based nanocarriers. Rather than providing a description of every type, the review compares them based on loading capacity, biodistribution, tumor infiltration capabilities, biodegradability, their safety profiles, and potential for real-world applications. It highlights some of the main challenges of targeted drug delivery in the mineralized bone microenvironment and presents some new ideas in order to enhance the targeting of skeletal tumors with ligand-mediated and stimuli-responsive nanocarriers. The review also highlights the state-of-the-art progress in the clinical development of miRNA therapeutics, the lessons learned from those in clinical trial phases, and the major challenges to clinical application of miRNA therapeutics such as toxicity in the immune system, manufacturing scalability, batch-to-batch variability, formulation instability, regulatory issues, and cost considerations. Finally, emerging research areas are discussed, with a focus on those trends that involve advances in personalized nanomedicine (evidence-based) and strategic nanocarrier design. While there are hopeful signs of miRNA nano therapy's potential in the treatment of osteosarcoma, significant biological, technological, and regulatory hurdles remain that need to be overcome for this innovative therapy to be translated to the clinic.

Indexed as

Bone NeoplasmsDrug Delivery SystemsMicroRNAsNanoparticlesOsteosarcomaAnimalsDrug CarriersExosomesHumansNanomedicineDrug CarriersMicroRNAsChemoresistanceExosome-based deliverymetastasismicroRNA therapeuticsNanocarriersOsteosarcomaPrecision nanomedicineTargeted drug delivery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.