ArticleJapanese journal of ophthalmology2026
Epidemiology of macular dystrophy in Japan (2011-2020): a nationwide population-based study.
Article in Japanese journal of ophthalmology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo describe the characteristics and prevalence of macular dystrophy using a comprehensive national claims database in Japan. STUDY
designPopulation-based retrospective study using a nationwide claims database.
methodsApproximately 126 million individuals covered by Japan's universal health coverage system were included. Health insurance claims from 2011 to 2020 stored in the National Database of Health Insurance Claims (NDB) of Japan were analyzed. Patients with macular dystrophy, including best vitelliform macular dystrophy (BVMD), Stargardt disease (STGD), cone/cone-rod dystrophy, or central areolar choroidal dystrophy (CACD), were identified using diagnostic codes recorded in the database. The population-based prevalence of diagnosed macular dystrophy was calculated, and age-standardized rates were derived using the WHO standard world population.
resultsBetween 2011 and 2020, 1,268 patients with BVMD, 460 with STGD, 5758 with cone/cone-rod dystrophy, and 280 with CACD were identified in the NDB. As of October 1, 2020, the corresponding prevalence rates were 10.05, 3.65, 45.65, and 2.35 per 1,000,000 persons, respectively.
conclusionThis nationwide study provides updated epidemiological estimates of macular dystrophy in Japan. These findings may inform clinical management, healthcare planning, and future research on macular dystrophy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690510What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.