ArticleEnvironmental geochemistry and health2026
Chromium as a severe anthropogenic geochemical anomaly in river sediments near a tannery outfall: spatial attenuation, source apportionment and ecological risk screening.
Article in Environmental geochemistry and health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Relocating a polluting industry can transfer contamination to a new receiving water body rather than eliminate it, yet the resulting sediment footprint is rarely resolved beyond surface contamination. This study quantified the spatial and depth-resolved sediment footprint of relocated tannery discharge in the Dhaleshwari River, Bangladesh, and distinguished anthropogenic from geogenic elemental signatures. Sixty sediment samples from 18 sites were analysed for 15 elements by neutron activation analysis. Sites were evaluated individually and within four spatial zones (discharge, opposite riverbank, upstream, and downstream) using non-parametric statistics, sediment-quality indices, and Positive Matrix Factorisation (PMF). Chromium was the dominant anomaly, with concentrations at the discharge point reaching ~260 times the average crustal value (mean: 24,514 ± 16,058 µg/g), declining significantly with distance from the outfall and differing among zones. Depth profiles showed no significant vertical trend across the full sediment cores, but significant near-surface enrichment occurred in the near-field cores, consistent with episodic, source-proximal deposition. Half of all samples exceeded the chromium Effects Range Median threshold. Source apportionment attributed only 15.5% of elemental variance to anthropogenic, chromium-dominated inputs, compared with 65.5% to natural weathering and 19.0% to mixed natural-industrial signatures. Thus, a comparatively small anthropogenic contribution governs the sediment's principal screening-level ecological concern. This pattern is consistent with particle-reactive Cr being rapidly retained near its release point, producing a sharply confined hotspot rather than basin-wide dispersion. Because risk estimates are based on total Cr rather than speciation or bioavailability, they do not demonstrate biological toxicity. The findings support prioritising targeted interventions at the discharge zone over basin-wide remediation for managing industrial river contamination in comparable settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.