ArticlePlant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands)2026
Development of a Soy-Pea-Based Nugget Using Texturized Commercial Products: Physicochemical and Sensory Evaluation.
Article in Plant foods for human nutrition (Dordrecht, Netherlands), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Interest in meat alternatives has driven the development of plant-based analogs from legume extrudates. Commercial textured pea (TP) and soy (TS) were used to formulate chicken-nugget analogs with TP: TS ratios (100:0, F1; 75:25, F2; 50:50, F3; 25:75, F4; 0:100, F5), and their physicochemical properties and sensory characteristics were evaluated. Proximate composition, water-retention capacity (WRC), oil-holding capacity (OHC), emulsifying activity (EA), emulsion stability (ES), and least gelation concentration (LGC) were determined in TP and TS. The soy-pea-based nuggets (SPBNs) were evaluated for texture profile, color, and compared with a commercial chicken nugget. Consumer sensory tests of texture, flavor, and appearance were conducted for F2, F3, and F4 nuggets. The TP had higher fat and protein content (P < 0.05) than TS, while moisture and ash contents were lower. TP showed higher WRC (2.71 g/g), EA (34.62%), and ES (16.52%) than TS (2.31 g/g, 14.27%, and 10.47%, respectively). No significant differences in OHC or LGC of TS and TP were found. No differences (P > 0.05) in the texture profile of the F1 nugget compared to the commercial chicken nugget were observed. In general, the a* parameter increases (p < 0.05) with the increase of texturized pea in the formulations. Conversely, the L* and b* parameters decreased. The fried SPBNs showed b* values similar to those of the commercial chicken nugget and received scores above 9/15 for appearance, texture, and flavor in the sensory evaluation. TP and TS demonstrated potential to produce plant-based nuggets with physicochemical properties comparable to chicken nuggets, and good consumer acceptability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690483What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.