ArticleEuropean radiology2026
Topogram-based anatomical labelling of CT series: anatomy-aware CT data processing using deep learning.
Article in European radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesThis study provides a Rapid Analysis and Processing of Image Data (RAPID) framework that combines deep learning-based CT topogram analysis with DICOM spatial geometry to enable reliable anatomical labelling of CT series independent of inconsistent textual metadata. MATERIALS AND
methodsIn this single-centre retrospective study, three YOLOv8-based models comprising the RAPID framework were trained on CT topograms to perform global anatomical classification, body-region detection, and landmark detection. Classification used 83207 topograms (20,802 test), while landmark and body region detection models were trained on 2000 (500 test) and 1926 (481 test) topograms, respectively, collected between 2003 and 2022. Model performance was evaluated using the F1 score and mAP50, with additional external validation on the external cohort. Furthermore, three radiologists independently reviewed 150 randomly selected predictions for detection models using a Likert-scale-based clinical assessment with inter-rater agreement.
resultsAcross a total of 65,250 patients (median age, 62 years; interquartile range, 23; 44% female) included in training and testing, inference performance achieved an overall internal F1 score of 0.920 and an external score of 0.970 for classification. Body region and landmark detection achieved internal mAP50 values of 0.993 and 0.958, with corresponding F1 scores of 0.996 and 0.957, respectively. The external mAP scores for detection tasks were 0.952 and 0.926, with corresponding F1 scores of 0.929 and 0.905, respectively. Experts' reviews were generally consistent with the technical evaluation.
conclusionRAPID enables accurate image-derived anatomical labelling of CT series using topograms. KEY POINTS: Question Reliable anatomy-based CT series labelling is essential for clinical workflows, but the traditional approach that relies on inconsistent DICOM metadata requires manual review and limits scalability. Findings The three proposed deep learning models achieved high performance in identifying anatomical regions and landmarks, with expert assessments in agreement with the quantitative evaluation. Clinical relevance Deep Learning-based analysis of CT topograms with DICOM-derived spatial geometry, enables reliable and reproducible image-based anatomical labelling of CT series, reducing reliance on inconsistent DICOM attributes and improving data consistency and scalability for clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690467What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.