ArticleEuropean journal of applied physiology2026
Vascular and autonomic recovery after resistance training with and without post-exercise static stretching: a randomized controlled crossover trial.
Article in European journal of applied physiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeResistance training (RT) may induce transient changes in endothelial and autonomic patterns. Static stretching (SS) performed at the end of an RT session may alter the temporal course of recovery of these responses. This study investigates whether SS following RT modulates acute endothelial, autonomic, and haemodynamic recovery compared with RT alone.
methodsTwenty-seven healthy males completed three experimental sessions in a randomized-crossover design: RT, RT + SS, and control condition (CC). RT consisted of two upper-body resistance exercises (bench-press and seated-biceps curl), while RT + SS included the same RT protocol followed by SS of the same muscle groups. Flow-mediated dilation (FMD%), brachial-artery diameter (BA diameter), heart rate variability (HRV), heart rate (HR), and mean arterial pressure (MAP) were measured at baseline (BL), immediately after exercise (POST), and 30 min after exercise (POST30).
resultsRT produced a significant reduction in FMD% at POST (p < 0.001; Cohen's d = 1.58), which remained below the BL value at POST30 (p = 0.012; d = 0.90); these decreases were not observed in RT + SS. The BA diameter increased following both conditions; however, at POST30 it remained above BL only following RT (p < 0.001; d = 0.60). At POST, both conditions significantly reduced RMSSD and HF, along with an increase in HR. At POST30, however, HF and RMSSD showed an unfavorable recovery in RT alone (p = 0.016; d = 0.72; p = 0.028; d = 0.57), while in RT + SS all values returned to BL. MAP decreased at POST in both conditions and returned to BL at POST30.
conclusionThe addition of SS at the end of a RT session was associated with earlier autonomic and vascular recovery compared with RT alone. SS may represent a simple and sustainable recovery strategy after RT.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690430What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.