ArticleSurgery today2026
The role of diagnostic and therapeutic endoscopic retrograde pancreatography in traumatic pancreatic injury: a retrospective single-center study.
Article in Surgery today, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTraumatic pancreatic injuries are uncommon but challenging to manage. This study aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of traumatic pancreatic injury and explore the role of early endoscopic retrograde pancreatography (ERP) as a diagnostic and therapeutic approach.
methodsWe reviewed 14 patients with traumatic pancreatic injuries treated between 2007 and 2025. Injuries were classified according to the Japanese Association for the Surgery of the Trauma System. Clinical outcomes were analyzed according to early ERP use (≤ 24 h after injury).
resultsThree patients had a type I injury, one had a type II injury, five had a type IIIa injury, and five had a type IIIb injury. Patients with a type IIIa/b injury had higher serum amylase levels at 24 and 48 h, as well as higher secondary intervention rates and longer hospital stays. Among five patients who underwent early ERP, the main pancreatic duct injury was successfully bridged in one patient with a type IIIb injury, enabling non-operative management. There were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between the early ERP and delayed/no ERP groups.
conclusionsAppropriate management of traumatic pancreatic injuries resulted in favorable outcomes. Further studies are required to clarify the clinical importance of early ERP.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42690427What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.