Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42690340›Full record

ArticleNeuroradiology2026

Origin-entry geometry and left-sided V1 vertebral artery tortuosity: a retrospective cross-sectional CT angiography study.

Răzvan Costin Tudose, Rodica Narcisa Calotă, Mugurel Constantin Rusu

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroradiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Răzvan Costin TudoseDivision of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania. razvan-costin.tudose0721@stud.umfcd.ro.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4655-4574
Rodica Narcisa CalotăDivision of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Mugurel Constantin RusuDivision of Anatomy, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8723-0540

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeV1 vertebral artery (VA) tortuosity is associated with cervical artery dissection, stent fracture, and endovascular access difficulty, and predominates on the left; its anatomical basis and its relationship to VA dominance have not been quantitatively tested on CT angiography (CTA).

methodsBilateral V1 morphometric analysis was performed on 50 cervical CTAs (24 men, 26 women; 63.2 ± 15.5 years). The tortuosity index (TI) was computed as the centreline-to-straight-line length ratio; VA dominance was determined at two segmental levels.

resultsLeft V1 was more tortuous than right (TI 1.37 ± 0.26 vs. 1.20 ± 0.15; Wilcoxon p < 0.0001; d_z = 0.74) in 82% of patients. TI correlated with age (Spearman ρ = 0.599, p < 0.001 for left; ρ = 0.439, p = 0.001 for right) but not with sex, and showed no association with calibre-based dominance (p = 0.53). A more cranial VA origin was associated with higher TI (Spearman ρ = -0.64, p < 0.001 for left; ρ = -0.37, p = 0.009 for right) and remained a significant predictor in multivariable linear regression adjusted for age and sex (left V1 β = -0.0408 per ordinal step toward a more caudal origin, 95% CI - 0.0683 to - 0.0133, p = 0.005) against a conserved bilateral C6 transverse-foraminal entry (76%). We refer to this configuration as the origin-entry mismatch.

conclusionLeft-sided V1 tortuosity was associated with an origin-entry geometric mismatch; no association with calibre-defined dominance was detected.

Indexed as

Anatomic variationCerebral angiography.Cervical vertebraeComputed tomography angiographyVertebral artery

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.