SynthesisCadernos de saude publica2026
Association between Chagas disease and the occurrence of stroke: systematic review with meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Cadernos de saude publica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aimed to conduct a systematic review of the association between Chagas disease and stroke, and to estimate the magnitude of this association through meta-analyses. A systematic review was conducted following the steps recommended by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The MEDLINE via PubMed, Virtual Health Library, Web of Science, and Embase databases were searched, and all studies on the topic were considered, with no restrictions on language or publication period. Studies lacking the groups of interest (individuals with and without Chagas disease) or stroke as an outcome were excluded. Design-specific meta-analyses were performed using a random-effects model. Of the 1,695 studies identified, 7 were included in the systematic review and 6 in the meta-analysis. Among cohort studies (n = 2), the pooled meta-analysis estimate showed an increased risk of stroke among individuals with Chagas disease (RR = 1.92; 95%CI: 1.20-3.06). Among cross-sectional studies (n = 4), the pooled estimate revealed a higher prevalence of stroke among individuals with Chagas disease (PR = 1.63; 95%CI: 1.22-2.18). The certainty of evidence was rated as very low according to the GRADE approach. The results indicated an association between Chagas disease and stroke; however, they should be interpreted with caution, considering the heterogeneity across study designs and the small number of studies. Further studies with more homogeneous designs are needed to better understand this relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.